ANI’s lawyer, Siddhant Kumar, defined that the online sequence has used the company’s trademarked content material, which is a severe concern.
Netflix’s net sequence IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack has been on the heart of a number of controversies since its launch. After dealing with criticism for allegedly altering the names of Pakistani Muslim terrorists to Hindu code names, the present is now caught in a authorized battle. Information company ANI has filed a lawsuit towards the creators of the sequence, demanding the elimination of 4 episodes for utilizing ANI’s content material with out permission.
ANI’s lawyer, Siddhant Kumar, defined that the online sequence has used the company’s trademarked content material, which is a severe concern. With the sequence being surrounded by criticism, ANI believes that its model can be being negatively impacted. Because of this, they’re pushing for the elimination of the episodes the place ANI’s content material was used with out consent. The Delhi Excessive Courtroom has accepted the case and requested Netflix to reply to the claims.
What’s the IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack Controversy?
For these unfamiliar, Netflix’s IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack is a fictional retelling of the 1999 hijacking of Indian Airways flight IC 814 from Kathmandu. Since its launch final month, the present has been criticized on social media and by some political members, significantly from the BJP, for allegedly altering the names of the hijackers. The Ministry of Data and Broadcasting even known as in Netflix officers to debate these issues. In response, Netflix added disclaimers to make clear that the code names within the present replicate these used through the precise incident.
Nonetheless, the talk over identify adjustments appears pointless. Based on the official assertion from the Union Residence Ministry on January 6, 2000, the hijackers did, actually, use nicknames like “Physician,” “Burger,” “Bhola,” and “Shankar.” Movie critic Anmol Jammwal (from Tried and Refused Productions) shared the doc on social media, calling the outrage misguided and unlucky. Regardless of the controversies, the sequence continues to be a scorching matter of debate.
